Archive for June, 2009

Tips for Coaching Managers

Tuesday, June 9th, 2009

I wrote the short article below for a client’s in-house publication.

I resurrect it here after being part of a discussion during an AHRI workshop on the differences between coaches and mentors.

My contribution was to the effect that managers shouldn’t try to be a coach (noun) but they certain need to coach (verb).

I like the ambiguity in the title; are the tips for managers who coach or for coaching managers?

Both; but I think I meant the former when I wrote it.

Seven Tips for Coaching Managers

We are often asked “what do coaches do differently to managers?”
The answer we give is that there shouldn’t be very much difference at all.  But in practice there often is a wide gap. Of course the full range of responsibilities for a manager is much broader than just coaching their staff. However, taking a coaching approach will help you as a manager to do a better job across all your responsibilities, not just with developing your people.
Looking at the following seven tips for coaching managers, how might you be a more effective manager if this was what you did?

  1. Ask questions. One trap many managers make is to think that they have to be the expert and know everything.  The best performing teams are the ones that make full use of all the expertise and talent in the team. One of the key responsibilities of the manager is to identify and utilise the strengths of their team. The best and simplest way to do this is to ask questions rather than give answers.
  2. Listen to the answers. If you are going to ask questions, you might as well listen to the answers.  And then, do something with the answers. Enter into a discussion about the topic, ask your staff to follow up your discussion, do something yourself with the information. Whatever you do, don’t ignore their response.
  3. Collaborate. Another trap managers can fall into is to keep working as an individual when the whole idea is to get things done through and with others. The strength of a team comes from making use of the skills and expertise of the team members. The performance of a team comes from its members applying their strengths towards a common goal. Both a good coach and a good manager aim to make this happen.
  4. Stop and think. There is always too much to be done. This puts pressure on managers and their staff to leap straight to action without enough (if any) thinking, planning, investigation or questioning. A good coaching manager will both model a “think then do” approach as well as encouraging their staff to stop and think before they act.
  5. Focus on relationships. Research suggests that the quality of the relationship between a coach and coachee is about three times more important to the outcome than which technique is used. What might happen if you put more effort into nurturing relationships with your team rather than managing process issues? We think you’ll find that you’ll get a lot more engagement, initiative and less resistance to change.
  6. Let go. A pattern we see all the time, especially with managers from a technical or professional background, is letting go of doing the work they love doing. They fail to delegate this hands on work to their team members. This has two consequences; they don’t have enough time to manage and their staff don’t gain experience and develop their professional skills. The best thing you can do as a manager and coach is to assign your staff lots of challenging and stimulating work. You’ll have more time to do what you should be doing and they’ll get better at what they do.
  7. It’s not about you. A theme running through all the previous six tips and our whole approach to developing leadership, management and coaching, is that the focus should be on the followers, team members and coachees, not on the leaders, managers or coaches. It’s not what you do but what the other person does that matters. This is why we say you as a manager and coach need to ask questions, listen, understand your people, get them involved, give them work. True success as a leader, manager or coach is about getting others to do more than would have been possible without you and for them to think they did it themselves.

“No coach has ever won a game by what he knows; it’s what his players know that counts”
Paul Byrant 
American College Football Coach

I particulary like the final quote. I have no idea who Paul Byrant is or how successful he is/was as a coach but its always nice to hear someone else expressing what you think.

Cheers

David

Leader Training - a waste of time and money

Monday, June 1st, 2009

I refered to our latest Leading Change Newsletter “Leader Training - A waste of time and money” in a previous blog entry.

I thought I’d leave a link here on the blog to make it easy to download.

Cheers

David

Leadership Debate

Monday, June 1st, 2009

One of my roles outside of Insight & Influence is as the NSW Co-ordinator of the Australian Psychological Society’s Interest Group in Coaching Psychology (IGCP). In this capacity, I organised a public debate between Randal (my partner here at I&I) and Peter Zarris, the National Convenor of IGCP on leadership.

The publicity blurb for the event was:

The NSW APS Interest Group in Coaching Psychology invites you to join us for what promises to be a lively and controversial evening.

Live Debate: Natural born leader v The developed leader

“Not everyone deserves or will benefit from leadership development. It should be reserved for a select few who can show that they have what it takes to be a leader”.

In the red corner (affirmative), we have Peter Zarris, IGCP National Convenor and CEO of Opic Consulting, a Melbourne consultancy that provides a range of on-line psychological assessment and development products and services. Peter’s approach to leadership development starts with assessing participants’ leadership potential using personality and aptitude tests. He believes that “leadership development is so far ranging that you have to measure the target development. It’s a waste of time for those who don’t have the potential.”

In the blue corner (negative), we have Randal Tame, the CEO of Insight & Influence, a leading Sydney change leadership consultancy and an Adjunct Lecturer at Macquarie Graduate School of Management. Randal believes too much leadership development follows the 19th Century’s “Great Man” approach which suggests that leaders have special personal qualities which set them apart from their followers. He holds that research instead shows that leadership is a group based phenomena and that anyone can be a leader.

Do you agree? Disagree? Both schools of thought have their supporters and the evening will be an opportunity to hear each side argue their case as persuasively as possible, present evidence, anecdotes and examples to support their claims. The debate will then move into the audience with small group discussions and will conclude with a moderated open discussion of the issues. We expect discussion to continue well into the evening as audience members pick up the batons and continue the debate over a cold drink.

If you work in the area or are interested in leadership, join us for what should be both an entertaining and informative evening. Please feel free to invite friends or colleagues that may like to join us and be part of the evening. We look forward to seeing you there!


I wrote the debate proposition to be deliberately provocative.

It all came from a conversation I had with Peter about leadership development where he said;

“You know, the more I do this the more I realise that some people just aren’t meant to be leaders and it’s a waste of time putting them on leadership development programs. ”

“In fact, ” he continued, ” it’s like trying to teach a pig to sing”.

“What do you mean?” I asked, not getting the connection.

“It sounds like crap and annoys the pig, so just don’t try it in the first place.”

“You really need to have a good talk with Randal about this because that’s the opposite of what he believes.” I replied, “In fact, we should get you two guys up on stage and slug it out.”

“Sounds like fun” said Peter.

From tiny acorns ….

The debate itself was a great success with over 90 attendees at the Royal Automobile Club in Sydney on April 6.

We have also just repeated the event in Brisbane last Friday night May 29 and attracted over 40 people to the Mill Hotel.

One of the participants said it was the best event she had been to in years.

If any of you attended either of the two events let us know what you thought.

We recorded the Sydney debate and if you would like to listen please click on the below link.

Warning: it’s a big mp3 file (about 36Mb) and runs for 1 hr 22 minutes.

It includes my introduction, the debate and the subsequent audience discussion.

Here’s the link to the recording of the Sydney debate.

After Sydney and Brisbane, we intend to take the show to Canberra in the near future.

If you would like Peter and Randal to present the debate at your conference, convention, wedding or bar mitzvar let us know. Happy to travel.

Cheers

David