Archive for the ‘Leadership Development’ Category

The Great Leadership Debate - Canberra

Friday, October 9th, 2009

If you are interested in leadership development and coaching and live in Canberra, you should get along to Unit 8 / 9 Sydney Ave, Barton to listen to another iteration of the Great Leadership Debate where Randal gets to argue with an organisational psychologist about whether leaders are born or made.

Previously he sparred with Peter Zarris but this time he is paired against Dr Elizabeth Allworth. Elizabeth is a prominent and accomplished organisational psychologist who this year won the prestigious Elton Mayo Professional Practice Award. Elizabeth is a principal at Allworth Juniper and will take the position that measureable personal attributes and qualities do make a difference in leadership. Randal will again argue that leadership is a social phenomenon and it is the leader’s  relationship with the group that determines the quality and effectiveness of leadership and not the personal qualities of the leader.

These debates are always fun and informative so if you are lucky enough to be in Canberra (☺) Tuesday 13 October come along to  Unit 8 / 9 Sydney Ave, Barton. You can book online here or find out more here.

Leader Training - a waste of time and money

Monday, June 1st, 2009

I refered to our latest Leading Change Newsletter “Leader Training - A waste of time and money” in a previous blog entry.

I thought I’d leave a link here on the blog to make it easy to download.

Cheers

David

Leadership Debate

Monday, June 1st, 2009

One of my roles outside of Insight & Influence is as the NSW Co-ordinator of the Australian Psychological Society’s Interest Group in Coaching Psychology (IGCP). In this capacity, I organised a public debate between Randal (my partner here at I&I) and Peter Zarris, the National Convenor of IGCP on leadership.

The publicity blurb for the event was:

The NSW APS Interest Group in Coaching Psychology invites you to join us for what promises to be a lively and controversial evening.

Live Debate: Natural born leader v The developed leader

“Not everyone deserves or will benefit from leadership development. It should be reserved for a select few who can show that they have what it takes to be a leader”.

In the red corner (affirmative), we have Peter Zarris, IGCP National Convenor and CEO of Opic Consulting, a Melbourne consultancy that provides a range of on-line psychological assessment and development products and services. Peter’s approach to leadership development starts with assessing participants’ leadership potential using personality and aptitude tests. He believes that “leadership development is so far ranging that you have to measure the target development. It’s a waste of time for those who don’t have the potential.”

In the blue corner (negative), we have Randal Tame, the CEO of Insight & Influence, a leading Sydney change leadership consultancy and an Adjunct Lecturer at Macquarie Graduate School of Management. Randal believes too much leadership development follows the 19th Century’s “Great Man” approach which suggests that leaders have special personal qualities which set them apart from their followers. He holds that research instead shows that leadership is a group based phenomena and that anyone can be a leader.

Do you agree? Disagree? Both schools of thought have their supporters and the evening will be an opportunity to hear each side argue their case as persuasively as possible, present evidence, anecdotes and examples to support their claims. The debate will then move into the audience with small group discussions and will conclude with a moderated open discussion of the issues. We expect discussion to continue well into the evening as audience members pick up the batons and continue the debate over a cold drink.

If you work in the area or are interested in leadership, join us for what should be both an entertaining and informative evening. Please feel free to invite friends or colleagues that may like to join us and be part of the evening. We look forward to seeing you there!


I wrote the debate proposition to be deliberately provocative.

It all came from a conversation I had with Peter about leadership development where he said;

“You know, the more I do this the more I realise that some people just aren’t meant to be leaders and it’s a waste of time putting them on leadership development programs. ”

“In fact, ” he continued, ” it’s like trying to teach a pig to sing”.

“What do you mean?” I asked, not getting the connection.

“It sounds like crap and annoys the pig, so just don’t try it in the first place.”

“You really need to have a good talk with Randal about this because that’s the opposite of what he believes.” I replied, “In fact, we should get you two guys up on stage and slug it out.”

“Sounds like fun” said Peter.

From tiny acorns ….

The debate itself was a great success with over 90 attendees at the Royal Automobile Club in Sydney on April 6.

We have also just repeated the event in Brisbane last Friday night May 29 and attracted over 40 people to the Mill Hotel.

One of the participants said it was the best event she had been to in years.

If any of you attended either of the two events let us know what you thought.

We recorded the Sydney debate and if you would like to listen please click on the below link.

Warning: it’s a big mp3 file (about 36Mb) and runs for 1 hr 22 minutes.

It includes my introduction, the debate and the subsequent audience discussion.

Here’s the link to the recording of the Sydney debate.

After Sydney and Brisbane, we intend to take the show to Canberra in the near future.

If you would like Peter and Randal to present the debate at your conference, convention, wedding or bar mitzvar let us know. Happy to travel.

Cheers

David

My favourite authors

Thursday, May 14th, 2009

A good place to start in understanding someone is to check out their library. What you read often becomes what you think. At the very least it is part of the web of influence on one’s thinking and approach to their work.

So I thought I’d start my blog proper by listing some of my favourite authors and other influences upon my professional work.

Henry Mintzberg

Nearly everyone interested in management and leadership will know Mintzberg. He embodies the “think different” ethos and continues to make valuable contrarian contributions on classrooms being poor places to learn management, what managers really do, leadership, airlines and what ever else catches his gaze.

A great thought leader.

http://www.henrymintzberg.com/

Bandura

Albert Bandura is one of the great under-recognised psychologists. His greatest contribution in my opinion has been the concept of self efficacy. I have found this to probably be the single most useful concept in my practice of coaching and leadership development. I suspect his popularity has suffered from his particularly impenetrable writing style but repeated readings are rewarded with brilliant ideas that can make a great difference to people’s confidence in themselves and their capability to succeed.

This site is probably the best introduction to his ideas and how they can be used:

http://des.emory.edu/mfp/self-efficacy.html#bandura

Morgan W McCall Jr

I’ve only recently rediscovered Morgan McCall’s work on the importance of experiential learning in developing leadership capability. His work at the Centre for Creative Leadership ( a great institution that has been a strong influence on our own approach to leadership development) in the mid 80s created the now famous 70 20 10 rule which we constantly refer to in our work. This rule says that in developing leadership:

70% of the learning comes from challenging workplace experiences

20% comes from supportive and encouraging relationships - supervisors, mentors, coaches and colleagues, and just

10%  is from traditional sources of learning such as training, reading and education.

Our conundrum is that if this is true (most people accept this at face value but the research seems to also support it) why do most leadership training and development program focus on the 10% at the expense of the 70%?

This is something we address in our latest newsletter “Leader Training - A waste of time and money”. We hope this is provocative and we would love to start a debate on this. Have a read and let us know what you think.

That’s enought for now. I’ll list some more authors in my next post.